Maybe it was jet-lag, but suddenly the Whingers’ 11+ hour flight from Peru seemed like a breeze compared with the 80-minute first act of War Horse at the National Theatre.
At least KLM provided the Whingers with some in-flight entertainment. Perhaps the National might follow suit and introduce seat-back systems featuring a massive menu of plays from which to choose? And maybe some games. Think about it, Nick. After all, the NFT (we still refuse to call it the BFI Southbank) seems to have thrown the towel in regarding its programming and now lets you watch what you want from 600 titles in its “mediatheque”.
Yet the evening had begun so promisingly.
As the Whingers sat down for their first pre-theatre bottle of Merlot at Canteen, their attention was drawn by an excited French waitress to the many police vehicles littering up the area. “The Queen is coming!” she cried.
Now this was a bit unexpected. Quite a few people have welcomed the Whingers back to London but we had no idea that Elizabeth the Second, by the Grace of God of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and of Her other Realms and Territories Queen, Head of the Commonwealth, Defender of the Faith was a fan.
Phil got into quite a tizzy and proceeded to practise his curtsey, knocking a glass of wine over in the process. Andrew leapt into action by throwing Phil’s coat into the resulting puddle to save Her Maj’s sensible court shoes from getting soiled and, perhaps predictably, a row ensued.
Anyway, there must have been some kind of mix-up because the poor woman ended up being guided to a rather dull sounding Royal Gala at the Royal Festival Hall apparently featuring some amateur choirs including Billinghurst Choral Society and the London Forest Choir from Walthamstow and where she ended up chatting with Billy Bragg and getting his autograph (we’re not making this bit up).
Thankfully, the Whingers were reassuringly back on home territory once inside the National Theatre and trying to deposit their suitcases (we had practically come straight from the airport) at the Olivier cloakroom which had been horrendously understaffed (to be fair, how could they have possibly known they were going to get a sudden rush of people at 7.20?).
Not wishing to attract another scolding by attempting to use an alternative cloakroom (this is forbidden under the National Theatre’s bye-laws), the Whingers waited obediently alongside a woman whose patience was being tested to her limits. Having been overlooked several times, she interjected with”I don’t wish to be rude…” but her pleas fell on deaf ears. The Whingers egged her on to be rude but she seemed to sense that she was being used for some ulterior purpose (i.e. cheap copy) and kept buttoned.
So, to the play. Things got off to a worrying start as actors with earnest faces sporting fishing rods with birds on the end of them wafted around the stage. Phil became anxious: he’d seen this somewhere before recently, where was it? Oh, yes – in the excellent Saint Joan by the same director (Marianne Elliott) on the very same stage. Only at SJ they’d nearly poked out the eye of someone sitting in the front stalls, so these guys weren’t taking any chances and played it very safe keeping the line completely reeled in. Most disappointing.
Anyway, in case you have no idea what we’re talking about, War Horse is a children’s book by the prolific Michael Morpurgo who – with 100 books under his belt – seems to be the Barbara Cartland of children’s literature.
He was apparently Children’s Laureate from 2003 to 2005. Now the Whingers – both being happily childless and Phil almost certainly being barren by now – had no idea that such a post even existed but according to Wikipedia “the position was established after a campaign spearheaded by Poet Laureate Ted Hughes and children’s writer Michael Morpurgo” which has given the Whingers a fantastic idea and we are going to spearhead a campaign for a Whinging Laureate although the DCMS is going to have to stump up more than £10k every two years to keep Phil in Wet Ones.
[Apologies at this point if we seem to be not talking very much about the play but we are "locating it in the wider discourse"]
Anyway, the point is that Nick Stafford’s adaptation of this children’s book about the First World War “told” through the eyes of a horse is apparently “suitable for 12 year olds and above” ostensibly because there’s a lot of death in it, but moreover because in rehearsals it was running at 3 hours 20 minutes. Now it is just 3 hours long according to the programme but we can’t testify to that for the usual reasons.
To be fair, everything you heard about the puppetry from the National’s propaganda machine is true. The Handspring Puppet Company has produced some fantastic work – the horses are incredibly lifelike in form and behaviour and imbued with emotions that one wouldn’t have thought possible. It’s fascinating to watch. For about 20 minutes.
Then boredom sets in and you start watching the people manipulating them instead. There were so many hands inside the horse that Phil was put in mind of All Creatures Great and Small and came over all queasy until he became distracted by the ear-plug sported by one of the puppeteers.
Co-directors Marianne Elliott (who we used to like) and Tom Morris have opted to transform this slight story into an epic piece of theatre but unfortunately “epic” is defined as “protracted” in the Whingers’ dictionary: interminable singing (the kind where ev-ry syll-a-ble is em-pha-sised) brings the already torpid pace to a complete standstill at times. And did we really need a brass band? By the time the accordion was trundled on Phil was beginning to wish that he was back struggling for air in a draughty adobe brick hut at 4,200 metres on a Lake Titicaca island without electricity or proper toilets.
There’s only so much puppetry an adult mind can take (Andrew can, of course, cope with slightly more than Phil) however good it is, and the Whingers made their excuses and their escape at the interval.
Were the Whingers’ brains working at double speed with their sudden rush of oxygen or was this production really as plodding as it seemed? Let us just say that Would-Be Whinger Mark also left in the interval of his own volition. And this is a man who enjoys listening to recorder music. Let’s just leave it at that.
















Thursday 11 October 2007 at 11:28 am
Lovely to have you chaps back – and with whinge intact, I see, despite recent oxygen/wine deprivation.
Thursday 11 October 2007 at 4:43 pm
“At least KLM provided the Whingers with some in-flight entertainment. Perhaps the National might follow suit.”
This is brilliantly savage – I wish I’d thought of saying it first.
>[Apologies at this point if we seem to be not talking very much >about the play but we are “locating it in the wider discourse”]
and I think I just disturbed my entire street with the violent shriek of laughter that this provoked.
Thursday 11 October 2007 at 5:28 pm
You are priceless and were much missed during your recent absence! I’m still giggling about ‘locating it in the wider discourse’.
Friday 12 October 2007 at 8:27 am
I have to say, as amusing as your reviews are, I thought War Horse a stunning piece of work. OK so it’s not perfect, but then again little that hits the Olivier stage is. But it made me weep. And not just because the huge woman sitting next to me caused me to sit in my seat at such an awkward angle I developed back ache within 15 minutes of the start.
Talking to a cast member afterwards he let slip that there were some “clunky” bits that still need to be ironed out. Which is something I can understand. Still, I would happily sit through this a second time.
Tuesday 16 October 2007 at 12:18 am
Judging by the date of the post, you must have seen a first or second preview, too – shouldn’t you mention that somewhere? I don’t know about Marianne elliott, but Morris’ shows are notorious for undergoing crazy changes in preview – look at matter of life and death.. I haven’t seen it but word elsewhere about this seems to be positive (although i understand accordions can be the end of the line). ??
Wednesday 17 October 2007 at 7:14 pm
Great review, but an early preview, so perhaps somewhat waspishly misplaced. The play has been shorn of 30 minutes and runs a tight 2 and half hours. Everyone around us were fighting over a small supply of tissues, set off by a poor woman at the front who lost it completely and let out a howl of anguish. No it was not the Queen. The play is at times somewhat one-dimensional, and the characters do not develope as one would expect in a more mature piece for the the-atre. However, how often does one identify with a fabulous horse as the romantic lead (apart from our own dear Emma T) and cheer as the play draws to a very quiet and understated close. By the way, the appearance of the tank is quite one of the most frightening things on the London stage. Go, and be prepared to weep copiously.
Wednesday 17 October 2007 at 8:10 pm
A tank???? Why weren’t we told???
And just to settle this preview thing once and for all:
We paid the same as the people who will go after it opens and we have the right to expect it to be finished.
Thank you.
PS: but love the phrase “waspishly misplaced”; we shall be using it and passing it off as our own.
Thursday 18 October 2007 at 3:17 pm
Hang on… how did you manage to pay the same as people who will go after it opens? NT previews are always cheaper.
Thursday 18 October 2007 at 3:30 pm
Front stalls are £10 for previews and regular performances.
So yes we paid the same as a regular post press-night punter would to sit in the same seats.
Plus we’re taking a risk that it will be rubbish. Which it so often is.
Saturday 20 October 2007 at 11:40 am
Whingers are right. Saw the 2 1/2 hour version. I grant you the first appearance of the big horse was stunning and I did cry at the end – I even liked the music. But this wasn’t enough to make up for the over stretched narrative and the patronising country bumpkin characterisations. This was a show where a flappy thing at the end of a long stick was exactly that – a flappy thing at the end of a long stick. This from someone who usually likes this sort of thing.
Tuesday 23 October 2007 at 10:06 pm
Boy loves horse. Says his name, “Joey” about 50 times. Boy loses horse. Boy finds horse.
It took 2 1/2 hours at the last preview and was so boring I went to sleep twice. Gruff sergeant major shouted at contry bumkin boy but was kind really. One interesting charactrers was the German who. who changed unifrom with a lower rank but he got killed quite soon after.
Lost count of male actors (18 ? or so) versus female actors (2 or so?).
Both my grandmothers were deeply scarred by the first world war (one lost a brother, the other a husband) and yet as is so often the case the stories of women are completely ignored.
Oh dear. The puppetry was good for a little while.
I am a secondary school drama teacher and am constantly looking for new plays to take students to. CORAM BOYS just about passed muster (despite women playing the roles or boys) but WAR HORSE was so-o-o boring.
Ho hum…back to BLOOD BROTHERS the only play we can find that enthuses teenagers…( I have seen it 24 times…)
Wednesday 24 October 2007 at 8:38 pm
I would have found BLOOD BROTHERS horribly boring. If you are the type that likes yukky musicals with yukky music, then why go and see something which has the wonderful music of John Tams? He is a genius and I would never miss anything with his music in it.
Sunday 28 October 2007 at 5:16 pm
Well – we saw the play on Friday, and would happily see it again. It was wonderful – I cried at the end. The puppetry excellent, the music fantastic, the seats couldn’t have been better either. The children in the audience were absolutely thrilled.
Sunday 28 October 2007 at 6:04 pm
Absolutely first class production, what is this nonsense about country bumpkins? Remember this was early 20th century in Devon – and what better than an all purpose National Theatre Lark Rise out of London accent (totally devoid of oik influence).
I ask a question – which song used in Candleford, was sung to a different tune in War Horse?
Sunday 28 October 2007 at 9:07 pm
It was also nice to be surrounded by an extremely nice, middle class audience with well behaved children.
Tuesday 30 October 2007 at 6:42 pm
having read the play before seeing it, i was positively surprised at what they made of it as the play isn’t exactly the greatest peace of writing. in my eyes, the production more than made up for the shortcomings of the text. the puppetry was excellent!
Tuesday 30 October 2007 at 8:28 pm
It heartens me to hear that ms Giles was able to enjoy her evening of middle class theatre surrounded by her middle class peers. I wonder how she felt when those horrid working class people were killed off, safe in the knowledge that enough of them were kept alive so that they could live to pay taxes which subsidise her wonderful seats. Perhaps she would like to start a campaign to ban them from the National altogether, although as she has observed, this is probably not necessary.
Thursday 1 November 2007 at 8:43 pm
I fully agree with Anne Giles.
Sunday 11 November 2007 at 3:01 pm
War Horse is a children’s book, but with very specific philosophy for us too.
Thursday 15 November 2007 at 12:49 am
Sorry guys, you’re very funny but it’s NOT funny to have a go at a show in previews. You may have paid the same (in the cheapest seats in the house) as a post-press night audience, but they are advertised as previews and therefore you take the risk that you are not seeing the finished product. Don’t be obnoxious.
Thursday 15 November 2007 at 3:57 pm
Elsie Bee
I saw the show yesterday and thought it was wonderful – I cried all the way through the second half.
However, I think you are wrong to take issue with the Whingers for reviewing a show they have paid money to see. What else can they do except write about what they have seen? They certainly can’t write about the version of the show you have seen – or the one I saw.
Surely a preview is just that – an opportunity to see a show before it has been reviewed by the press, sometimes at slightly reduced prices, sometimes not. The reduction in price reflects the fact that you don’t know until you read the reviews whether you are going to see a dud or not. You are taking a gamble and the theatre is selling seats.
I realise that there may be some tweaking to be done but it is not a dress rehearsal or a scratch night, for which you might reasonably expect to pay about 5.00 (which is what the Royal Ballet charge for a dress rehearsal and the BAC charge for a scratch night, for example).
If a theatre charges full price or knocks only a couple of pounds off the usual price during previews so that they can fill the house while they concentrate on getting the show right for the all-important press night but takes umbrage if a punter points out its short-comings, then it is they who are being obnoxious.
You are only saving a few pounds by going to a preview, in a deal most likely to appeal to poor people and theatre buffs. It is like buying a chicken that is nearing its sell-by date for a reduced price in Sainsbury’s. You don’t expect the thing to actually poison you.
If previews are to be treated as privileged information, with the shows somehow aired ‘in confidence’, then the theatres should throw open their doors for nothing, or charge only a nominal fee. Not only that, they need to say so on their websites. I have seen shows advertised as ‘previews’ but I have never, ever seen it written anywhere that this means they are a work in progress and that you shouldn’t expect them to be any good.
Finally, getting snippy because the Whingers were sitting in “the cheapest seats in the house” (oh, the shame!) kind of misses the point of the inclusivity of the wonderful ten pound seats initiative at the NT, doesn’t it?
Aw, sorry Elsie (and Andrew and Phil). I’ve gone on a bit. No hard feelings, Elsie. You may very well be connected to the production and trying to protect the actors and others involved in it, which is a very understandable reaction. Obviously, because of the ephemeral nature of theatre, a press review can serve as a historical record of a production (video doesn’t count, it’s always so flat and uninvolving) which is why you want the press night to be the best it possibly can be, and why press reviewers politely stay away from previews.
But this is a blog. There is a huge difference. Press reviews tell the reader what sort of show the reader can expect to see. Blogs talk about the show the blogger has seen. It’s different.
So anyway, don’t take anything you read on a blog too much to heart. It’s not about you. It’s about them. That’s why it’s so funny.
Thursday 14 February 2008 at 7:38 am
Have just seen War Horse at the end of its current run: boys, boys, I must say that as brilliantly written as your piece is, it’s just wrong, wrong, wrong.
War Horse
http://mopsa.blogspot.com/2008/02/war-horse.html
Friday 15 February 2008 at 9:04 pm
Saw the final show of War Horse last night. Slick, clever and imaginative stage production, and the puppetry was amazing, but felt the first half in particular was, how shall I put this… a cross between Old Bamboo from Mary Poppins (too many sticks) and Sesame Street. Then again it is based on a kids’ book so perhaps I’m being harsh.
Things definitely picked up in the second half and the appearance of the tank was astounding.
Loved the music and there is no denying the play packs an emotional punch, and yes I blubbed like a 14 stone baby.
In fact, I haven’t seen so many grown men grizzle since watching Kevin Costner get to play catch with his dead dad at the end of Field of Dreams. And is that a bad thing? Not playing catch with your dead dad (or any dead person… it’s wrong according to the police), but grown-up Guardian-reading, wine-supping, Tuscany-holidaying old gits sobbing (or trying not to).
Monday 19 May 2008 at 4:13 pm
I saw War Horse, and I cried when I saw it! Maybe most of you who went to it where adults, this show is for adults yes but it is more aimed at children/young teens/young adults…Blood Brothers and War Horse have both made me cry and I do not usually cry.
If you didn’t like it then why did you go? But anyway, great review apart from the negitive bits about War Horse…it is coming back for another turn at the end of this year!
Saturday 20 December 2008 at 5:19 pm
Saw the latest production of Warhorse in December 2008. Well the first half anyway.
I am amazed that no one has commented about the banality of the script, with dialogue used to clumsily explain the plot. For example in the auction scene the uncle refers to the other bidder as “my brother”. People do not talk to each other like this.
When the church bell tolls and a cast member steps forward and explains that war has been declared, that is the first we learn about the possibility of war. That could have been woven into the dialogue when explaining the relationship of the brothers and the behaviour of Albert’s father.
It is generally well staged although the scene illustrating the fleet sailing to France becomes self parody. When such care has been taken producing full scale horses with lifelike movement, the sight of a group of actors wobbling across the stage while holding models of warships is not clever, it’s just funny.
The horses are well realised and most of the staging is well done, but none of this should forgive a poor script with poor characterisation. Just because this production is aimed at children there is no excuse for short-changing them.
In the end the banality of the script and poverty of the acting proved too much and I had to give this play the accolade of an interval exit.
Friday 23 January 2009 at 3:59 pm
The horses were amazing, astounding, as they picked at grass, reacted to events, the ears in particular were superb. The first cavalry charge was great to look at very powerful and the two old horses pulling the gun carriage equally strong. The goose stole the show without a doubt and took an appropriate curtain call. What else? Set design and art was good liked that very much not so sure about references to Percy and Paul, though, but v good nevertheless and the tank (the tank!) was also pretty good especially when it threatened to wipe out those much despised £10 stalls seats at one point.
But tears? Tragedy of War? Nope. Every time events onstage provoked a scintilla of emotional response some idiot (the third Grundy brother?) shouted out “Joey” in such an irritating way that you wanted to shove your way past the legions of (fidgety but otherwise well-behaved) schoolchildren, get up onto the stage and slap him. There was no development or insight into any of the humans (agree with the comment wrt women) which would have allowed us to glimpse the pointlessness, tragedy and waste of war and as the central character was a dumb animal, we could hardly identify with that either. OK so many horses died but these were the equivalent of the red-jersey-wearing guys in star trek; anonymous and always for the chop (apologies to galaxy quest). Our hero Joey, meanwhile, came through bloodied but unbowed. How much more powerful for starters it would have been for him to have died also. As it was the over-riding (!) feeling was that “it was all ok” and it most certainly wasn’t all ok in WW1, not for the animals nor for the men nor for the women involved.
Given the audience, however, it is difficult to be too hard on Warhorse. It was a children’s book and is now a children’s play and as such it is excellent. Had the revolver not jammed when Joey was about to be shot I suspect that five hundred 13-yr old girls would have lynched the sergeant then and there and that the play provoked such a response is to its credit.
But just as you used to cringe when you saw grown-ups reading Harry Potter on the tube, so should adults be aware that they will be short changed if they want any kind of a profound experience from this play.
Friday 23 January 2009 at 5:56 pm
Saw Warhorse last night. I wish I’d stayed at home and buffed my entire glassware collection. OK, the puppets were amazing, let’s get that out of the way. However, I haven’t seen such diabolical acting since my mum pretended to like the scarf I bought her for Xmas. In 1982.
The actress playing the ‘mother’ is clearly Irish, but her onstage accent strayed from Ireland, Northern Ireland, Norwich and up to Liverpool in one of the most cringe-worthy performances I’ve ever had to pay to witness. It’s not implausible that her character could have been, in fact, Irish. So, rather than let her verbally gurn her way through the piece, and ruin the whole damn thing, why not let her just bloody speak in her Irish accent? It was so bad, it seemed to drain everyone else and tar them all with a shit-brush.
The ‘boy’, began by sounding like a Cornish Frank Spencer but did get marginally better. The rest of the acting was outrageous characature, as if the actors had read the script, thought ‘this is a bit rubbish’ and gone a bit mental adding as much personality to it as they could.
The singer who kept appearing at every emotional moment and breaking into weirdy Irish ballads about Ploughboys was one of the strangest theatrical devices I’ve ever seen. A device that would have worked much better had he been shot during an early war scene.
All in all, awful. Terrible. Diabolical. Apart from the puppets, they even had moving ears.
Monday 2 March 2009 at 1:49 pm
[...] before, I was advised that if it should have another staging that I make a point in booking it. I have also been warned about it but if it fails to capture my imagination, and as I am catching a matinee performance, all is not [...]
Tuesday 14 April 2009 at 10:34 pm
Saw it tonight. It was truly awful.
Friday 17 April 2009 at 2:14 pm
This was one of the most memorable plays I have ever seen. Fantastic!
Friday 17 April 2009 at 11:00 pm
hahahahahaha you whingers are so correct on this.
my grandma just bought 7 tickets for my family at £50 each and im afraid she was simply robbed.
yes the puppetry was good but that was it
the country bumkin was a moron whos accent simply made me and my brother laugh out loud, while my mother thought he had some sort of issue.
the comic parts were also pathetic, im sure people were only laughing because they were so bored anything was amusing.. everyones faces as we left the theatre just looked drained!
if you like puppetry go see the lion king on stage much more interesting.. nice story, amazing music and worth the £50!!
Sunday 17 May 2009 at 5:45 pm
agreed.